Back to Blog

Why We Stopped Tracking Hours

Time tracking is broken for creative work. Here's why we moved to effort tracking and what changed when we did.

By Aaron Nicely4 min read
Share:
Professor Capysaurus breaking free from a clock

For years, I ran my agency the way everyone else did: timesheets, hour targets, utilization reports. And for years, something felt deeply wrong.

The numbers never told the right story.

The Time Tracking Illusion #

Here's what the timesheets said: Alex logged 42 hours last week. Billable utilization: 78%.

Here's what they didn't say:

  • Alex spent 6 hours in a flow state solving a complex UX problem
  • Alex spent 6 hours in context-switching hell, bouncing between Slack, email, and three different projects
  • Both of those counted exactly the same

Time tracking assumes all hours are created equal. They're not. An hour of deep creative work is worth ten hours of fragmented attention. But our systems can't tell the difference.

The Surveillance Problem #

There's another issue, one nobody likes to talk about: time tracking feels like surveillance.

When you ask people to account for every 15-minute block of their day, you're sending a message: "We don't trust you."

That message erodes the psychological safety creative work requires. People start optimizing for tracked metrics instead of actual impact. They pad timesheets, fudge categories, and generally spend mental energy gaming a system instead of doing great work.

The Move to Effort Tracking #

Two years ago, we made a radical change. We stopped tracking time. Instead, we started tracking effort.

The difference is subtle but profound:

  • Time tracking asks: "How long did you work?"
  • Effort tracking asks: "How much did you do?"

We built a catalog of work types, each with an effort score. A complex animation might be a 5. A simple banner might be a 1. A client presentation deck might be a 4.

Then we track what work each person is carrying, not how many hours they spend on it.

What Changed #

1. Honest Conversations About Capacity #

When we tracked hours, the conversation was always defensive. "Why did this take 8 hours?" "I thought this was a 4-hour task."

When we track effort, the conversation is collaborative. "You're carrying 45 effort points this week and your capacity is 40. Which of these should move?"

It's not about blame. It's about balance.

2. Better Resource Decisions #

With time tracking, you know Sarah worked 45 hours last week. But you don't know if she's overloaded.

With effort tracking, you know Sarah's carrying work that totals 50 effort points against a 40-point capacity. That's a red flag, regardless of how many hours it took.

3. Fairer Distribution #

Some people are faster than others. Under time tracking, the fast worker looks underutilized while the thorough worker looks overworked - even if they're doing the same work.

Under effort tracking, they're both carrying the same effort. Speed becomes a personal efficiency, not a judgment.

4. Real Utilization Metrics #

"80% utilization" used to mean 32 hours of billable time per week. But that told us nothing about stress or sustainability.

Now "80% utilization" means carrying 32 effort points of work against 40-point capacity. That actually correlates to healthy workload.

The Hard Part #

I won't pretend the transition was easy. There were challenges:

Calibrating effort scores took time. We had to learn that what felt like a "3" to a senior person might feel like a "5" to a junior. The scores are role-relative, not absolute.

Breaking old habits was hard. People kept instinctively tracking hours, then converting to effort. It took months to truly let go.

Client expectations had to be managed differently. Some clients wanted to pay for hours. We had to explain our new model and why it delivered better results.

The Philosophical Shift #

At its core, this change was about trust.

Time tracking says: "Prove you were working." Effort tracking says: "Let's understand what you're carrying."

The first is surveillance. The second is care.

When you track effort, you're not asking people to justify their existence. You're trying to help them succeed. You're building a system that catches overload before burnout, that distributes work fairly, that enables honest planning.

That philosophical shift - from proving to supporting - changed everything about how our team operates.

Would We Go Back? #

Not a chance.

Our team is happier. Our planning is better. Our delivery is more predictable. And we finally stopped having those awful "where did your hours go" conversations that nobody enjoyed.

Effort tracking isn't just a different metric. It's a different relationship with work itself.


Ready to move beyond time tracking? See how Capysaurus handles effort-based capacity management.

Share:

About the author

Photo of Aaron Nicely

Aaron Nicely

Founder & CEO

Aaron Nicely is the founder of Capysaurus. His background in product management taught him to approach people management the same way—understand the work, define clear expectations, and build systems that help teams align and grow. When not thinking about capacity management, Aaron is a husband, father, musician, and volunteers helping grow future leaders.

Ready to make hiring decisions with confidence?

Capysaurus helps you understand your team's capacity so you can plan for growth - not react to crisis.

No credit card required • 30 days free

Related Articles

Why We Stopped Tracking Hours | Capysaurus Blog