15Five vs. Capysaurus: capacity 15Five infers by watching your tools, capacity we ask your team to name
What 15Five does well
Work Context (launched June 2026) builds a context graph across Slack, Teams, Asana, Notion, Jira, GitHub, and more — the most ambitious attempt yet to connect a 1:1 tool to the actual work, not just the conversation about it.
Focus Briefs assemble a weekly manager-facing brief, pulled from that same context graph, so the manager isn’t walking into 1:1s with nothing.
Kona, its AI coach, sits inside the 1:1 itself — not a separate dashboard you check beforehand, an assistant embedded where the conversation actually happens.
What it can’t tell you
Where the number comes from. Work Context infers what you’re carrying by watching where you’re active — commits, tickets, threads, docs touched. It’s a guess dressed up as data, and it’s a guess the person doing the work can’t see or correct.
Whether the person agrees with it. Focus Briefs are manager-facing. Kona coaches the manager’s side of the conversation. The picture 15Five builds is assembled for one person in the room, then walked in with.
If the inference is wrong. Being active in Slack and closing tickets isn’t the same as being at capacity. Someone can look busy in the context graph while quietly underwater on a client, or look quiet while carrying the hardest account on the team. Nobody outside the algorithm gets asked.
The difference that matters
Everyone else either ignores workload, or infers it by watching your work tools and reporting up to the boss. Capysaurus puts the same explicit capacity picture in front of the worker and the manager.
15Five is the sharpest version of that first pattern we’ve seen: it doesn’t ignore workload, it infers it — from Slack, Jira, GitHub, and the rest of your connected work tools — and hands the inference to the manager before the 1:1 starts. Capysaurus skips the inference. Your team sizes their own effort, in the open, and the same number sits in front of both people the whole time. Not a guess about you. Not a report about you sent somewhere you can’t see it. The same page.
15Five vs. Capysaurus at a glance
| 15Five | Capysaurus | |
|---|---|---|
| Price for a team of 10 | $40–160/mo (modular, annual only) | $29/mo flat |
| Capacity model | Inferred from activity across connected tools | Explicit — the team sizes the work in effort |
| Who sees the data | Focus Briefs are manager-facing | Manager and team member see the same picture |
| Contracts/minimums | Annual only | Month-to-month, no minimum |
| 1:1 prep source | Work Context graph + Kona AI coach | Shared capacity dashboard, prepped by the team |
Who should pick 15Five
If you’re already deep in the Slack, Jira, Asana, and GitHub ecosystem and you want a 1:1 tool that reaches into those systems automatically without asking your team to size anything themselves, Work Context is genuinely the most capable option on the market for that job. It also makes sense if you’re buying for an HR-led org that wants one annual contract spanning performance, engagement, and 1:1s — that’s the buyer 15Five is built for. If your team already logs its work faithfully enough in those tools that an inference is trustworthy, and you’re comfortable with the manager seeing a brief the team member doesn’t, it’s a legitimate choice.
Every 1:1 starts on the same page.
Capysaurus preps your one-on-ones from capacity data you and your team both see — who’s stretched, who has room, who’s ready to grow.
No tracking. No timers. Just the shared picture of the work, and a better conversation about it.
Start free